Associate Professor Wang Lin Hainan University School of Law
Recently, the Prior to public consultation on the draft for review, it has provided compensation to the persons responsible for the national recovery of the standard, but the formal introduction of the
this change to become more than the media and the core of the network editor to set the agenda, critics questioned and criticized the trend was one-sided. But in my opinion, criticized the The real problem actually hidden in the When the executive authorities have
from the Practice. The so-called In order to facilitate the claimant (usually the victim), but the way the claims of the supported by the unified management of the financial sector. Objective assessment, this Law.
In fact, the author from 2002 to the author several times in the media system of the landing calls for national recovery. If the State Compensation Law directly to alienation become a was also the state's financial backing, afraid!
to The original draft provisions, responsibility for personnel, compensation obligations shall be ordered to cover 50% of the cost of state compensation -100%, but can not exceed one year's basic salary. beyond the are the pre-recovery problem which must be resolved.
, of course, the existing organization or individual with the staff or to recover part or all of the state compensation costs. value.
revised State Compensation Law in the April 29, 2010 by the NPC Standing Committee passed the same year on December 1 came into effect. The middle of this seven months, can be seen as the new law left to the departments to complete the preparatory work prior to the implementation - the As soon as he implemented a law on the subject to the omission of public authorities, to reflect, I am afraid not only of public authority. For lawmakers, the provisions related to sectoral interests, whether it should be as detailed as possible to avoid the enforcement authority If they really can not be detailed in the law should also be built for the formulation of regulatory rules and systems, constraints on the program. Obligation to supervise the implementation of legislative authority during the transitional period must be introduced in the Legislative Rules. Refinement of the national recovery system, not a thing the executive, the judiciary also faces the implementation of judicial recourse. Failure to abide by, but also about the credibility and authority of the judiciary He Xingzheng?
No comments:
Post a Comment